A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
case regulation Case law is regulation that is based on judicial decisions relatively than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case legislation concerns one of a kind disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law , refers to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or subject.
Case regulation is specific to the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made clear that police is free to take action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties while in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot attain out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your lessen courts.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight given to any reported judgment may possibly depend on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is additionally a very well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, helping you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government guidelines for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard get more info aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on set up court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.